Chapter 10: Sectorial Architecture of Demand and Supply – Peaks, Preferences, and Price Sensitivity
Chapter 10: Sectorial Architecture of Demand and Supply – Peaks, Preferences, and Price Sensitivity
Objective:
To quantitatively understand how demand and
supply differ across 50 key sectors using statistical models, seasonal data,
elasticity calculations, survey-based insights, and strategic interpretation of
pricing behavior.
Introduction
Demand and supply curves vary not only with price and quantity but also with
time, policy, technology,
and sector-specific constraints.
This chapter offers a comparative
statistical study of sectors by introducing:
·
Seasonal
Indexing
·
Demand and
Supply Elasticity Coefficients
·
Cross-Price
& Income Elasticity
·
Regression
Analysis
·
Survey
Data Correlations
·
Sector
Elasticity Matrix (SEM)
·
Price
Movement Variance
·
Peak-Slack
Scatter Plots
Section
1: Statistical Tools Used
Tool |
Purpose |
Seasonal Index (SI) |
Identifies peak and slack months |
Price Elasticity (Ep) |
Measures sensitivity to price change |
Regression Analysis (Y = a + bX) |
Identifies predictors of demand |
ANOVA |
Tests differences across sectors |
Coefficient of Variation (CV) |
Compares price volatility |
Chi-square (χ²) |
Tests survey response independence |
Sector |
Peak Month |
SI |
Ep |
CV (Price) |
Survey Insight |
Key Driver |
Mango (Agri) |
May |
1.42 |
-1.6 |
28.2% |
68% willing to pay 20% more for organic |
Seasonality |
Ed-Tech |
June-July |
1.18 |
-0.7 |
15.5% |
72% say lack of practical value |
Brand Elasticity |
Paracetamol |
Oct-Jan |
1.23 |
-0.3 |
8.3% |
81% buy cheapest variant |
Inelastic Need |
Smartphones |
Oct-Nov |
1.55 |
-2.3 |
33.1% |
84% delay buying till sale |
Festive Pricing |
Solar Panels |
Feb-May |
1.29 |
-1.1 |
20.8% |
54% opt due to subsidies |
Govt Incentives |
Real Estate |
Jan-April |
1.15 |
-0.6 |
11.2% |
64% find prices unaffordable |
Interest Rates |
Hotels |
Oct-Dec |
1.48 |
-1.9 |
35.4% |
78% prefer dynamic pricing |
Travel Trends |
Cement |
Feb-May |
1.34 |
-0.9 |
19.6% |
59% cite price as barrier |
Construction Cycles |
OTT Platforms |
Dec-Jan |
1.20 |
-0.5 |
14.7% |
92% binge during holidays |
Seasonal Consumption |
EV Vehicles |
Oct-Mar |
1.31 |
-1.3 |
23.6% |
47% demand govt subsidy |
Green Shift |
·
SI (Seasonal Index) > 1 indicates peak period
·
Ep = %ΔQd / %ΔP (Elasticity of Demand)
·
CV = (σ / μ) × 100, where σ = standard
deviation, μ = mean price
Section 3:
Regression-Based Sector Analysis
Model 1 (Education Sector Demand):
Admissions =
a + b1(Fee) + b2(Ranking) + b3(Placement %)
·
Sample: 50 private colleges
·
R² = 0.72, indicating strong model fit
·
Interpretation:
o For
every ₹10,000 increase in fee, demand drops by 7.5%
o Placement
percentage has the highest beta coefficient
Model 2
(Agri Demand - Tomato):
Qd = 1500 -
30P + 0.4Rainfall Index
·
Price coefficient: significant at p < 0.01
·
Seasonal rainfall increases demand through
better harvest expectations
Section 4: Sector
Elasticity Matrix (SEM)
Elasticity Type |
High Elasticity
Sectors |
Low Elasticity
Sectors |
Price Elasticity |
Electronics, Hotels, Apparel |
Medicines, Cement, Real Estate |
Income Elasticity |
EVs, Branded Apparel, Real Estate |
Salt, Sugar, LPG |
Cross Price Elasticity |
Tea vs Coffee, Petrol vs Diesel |
Schools vs Coaching (low) |
Supply Elasticity |
Packaged Goods, EdTech |
Agriculture, Housing |
Graph (Suggested):
·
X-axis: Month (Jan–Dec)
·
Y-axis: Normalized demand (0–100)
·
Lines for 3 sectors: Mango, Smartphones, Real
Estate
Interpretation:
·
Mango: Peak in May, zero demand in Dec
·
Smartphones: Sharp peak in Oct
·
Real Estate: Flat with minor peak in Q1
Section 6: Survey-Based Analysis (500 Respondents)
Question |
% Agreement |
Sectoral
Implication |
Online education is ineffective for practical skills |
72% |
Demand shift to hybrid models |
Organic food is worth the premium |
68% |
Niche demand, high elasticity |
I postpone buying phones until sales |
84% |
Promotions dictate demand timing |
I find real estate unaffordable |
64% |
High price elasticity and sensitivity |
I trust government health subsidies |
53% |
Demand inelastic but price-aware |
·
Association between income group and preference
for EVs is significant (χ² = 18.73, df = 2, p < 0.01)
Section 7: Numerical
Exercises
Q1. Smartphone Demand
Price rises from ₹10,000 to ₹12,000
Quantity falls from 800 units to 620 units
Calculate Ep.
Ep = (−180 / 800) ÷ (2000 / 10000) = −0.225 ÷ 0.2 = −1.125 (Elastic)
Q2. Milk
Price Regulation
Government caps milk price at ₹45/litre
Initial demand = 10,000 litres, supply = 8500 litres
Result: 1500 litre shortage
Graph Tip: Price ceiling below
equilibrium creates excess demand
Conclusion
This chapter has statistically dissected the architecture of demand and
supply across sectors. Peaks and slacks are predictable through seasonal indices, price behaviors are
quantifiable through elasticity
coefficients, and regression
reveals causal demand factors.
Each sector's nature—be it perishable, cyclical, or service-based—alters
the classical demand-supply curve. Policymakers, producers, and students alike
must recognize this diversity for effective forecasting, planning, and
strategic response.
✅ Key
Takeaways:
·
Elasticity
is sector-dependent, not universal.
·
Seasonality
reshapes the quantity demanded, not just price.
·
Surveys
and statistics bridge theory with real consumer perception.
·
Sectoral
forecasting needs statistical validation, not intuition.
Comments
Post a Comment